The story about how Mike "The Monkees" Nesmith's mother invented liquid paper is surprisingly interesting.

She was a secretary. She saw a need and saw that the market would be women, because secretaries were women.

She priced the product low enough so that secretaries could buy it out of the discretionary fund they had for office supplies, without needing approval from a man.

And she marketed the product in a bottle that looked like nail polish, so her customers would already be familiar with using it before they even tried it.

Smart!

Gilbert Gottfried’s Amazing Colossal Podcast

Who let “Who Let the Dogs Out” Out?

99% Invisible: The world’s greatest expert on the song “Who Let the Dogs Out” finds it surprisingly difficult to answer the question of who wrote the song.

San Diego freelance writer Beth Demmon says California Assembly Bill 5, which regulates contract workers, threatens her livelihood. She says she’s taken an immediate income hit upwards of 25% due to the law.

The Doc nails it. The sole issue for Democratic voters in the Presidential election is “make the bad man go away.” Everything else is a distraction.

However, things get complicated because for many Democrats, Bloomberg and/or Sanders are as bad as the Bad Man.

And Warren, Mayor Pete and Uncle Joe are, for many voters, ALMOST as toxic as the Bad Man. Those voters will hold their noses and vote for any of those three candidates if they have to. But that speaks to low voter turnout – toxic for Dems.

Overall, I like the Democrats' odds. But we’re going to have to work hard to win.

Dave Winer makes the case for Bloomberg: More than a candidate for president.

I’m reserving judgment. I expect I’ll vote for Warren in the primary, assuming she’s still in the race, but other than that I don’t expect to support a candidate until the convention. And then I’ll support whichever Democrat wins.

Until a month ago I would have said “except maybe Bloomberg.” But I like the way he’s going after Trump. I still have strong reservations about Bloomberg, though.

The US is charging Huawei with racketeering

TechCrunch:

The DoJ alleges that Huawei and a number of its affiliates used confidential agreements with American companies over the past two decades to access the trade secrets of those companies, only to then misappropriate that intellectual property and use it to fund Huawei’s business.